– Rajesh Soundararajan
Why do graduates from second-level institutions perform better than ivy league in real life than the ones from the ivy league? How their training of doing more with less and the non-entitlement attitude helps them solve real-world problems in real-time than some esoteric fanciful branding exercises that ivy league alums adopt.
It is a common perception that graduates from Ivy League institutions, such as Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, are more successful and highly sought after in the job market compared to those from other universities. However, recent data suggests that this may not always be the case. In fact, graduates from second-level institutions, such as state universities and community colleges, may have a distinct advantage over their Ivy League counterparts in terms of real-world problem-solving and adaptability.
Here are a few reasons why graduates from second-level institutions may perform better in the real world than Ivy League graduates:
Training in resourcefulness: Second-level institutions often have fewer resources and funding compared to Ivy League schools. As a result, students at these institutions are often forced to be more resourceful and find creative solutions to problems. This training in resourcefulness can be invaluable in the real world, where employees are expected to be able to do more with less and think on their feet.
Non-entitlement attitude: Ivy League institutions are known for their exclusivity and prestige, which can lead to a sense of entitlement among their students. On the other hand, students at second-level institutions may have a more humble and grounded approach, as they are aware that they have had to work hard to get where they are. This non-entitlement attitude can be attractive to employers, as it indicates a willingness to work hard and learn, rather than expecting privileges or special treatment.
Real-world experience: Many second-level institutions offer hands-on, real-world experience through internships, co-op programs, and service learning opportunities. This practical experience can be valuable in helping graduates hit the ground running in their careers, as they have already had the opportunity to apply their skills and knowledge in a professional setting.
Diverse perspectives: Second-level institutions often have a more diverse student body compared to Ivy League schools. This diversity can lead to a more well-rounded and inclusive perspective, which can be beneficial in solving real-world problems and working with a diverse team.
In summary, while Ivy League institutions may have a reputation for producing successful graduates, there is evidence to suggest that graduates from second-level institutions may be just as, if not more, successful in the real world. Their training in resourcefulness, non-entitlement attitude, real-world experience, and diverse perspectives can all contribute to their ability to adapt and solve problems in the workplace.